home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
QRZ! Ham Radio 4
/
QRZ Ham Radio Callsign Database - Volume 4.iso
/
digests
/
digital
/
940261.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-11-13
|
26KB
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 94 04:30:14 PDT
From: Ham-Digital Mailing List and Newsgroup <ham-digital@ucsd.edu>
Errors-To: Ham-Digital-Errors@UCSD.Edu
Reply-To: Ham-Digital@UCSD.Edu
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: Ham-Digital Digest V94 #261
To: Ham-Digital
Ham-Digital Digest Fri, 5 Aug 94 Volume 94 : Issue 261
Today's Topics:
GIANT Help Wanted
Is the KAM 9612 out yet ?
REJECTED: Ham-Digital Digest V94 #260
Tandy 1000EX
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Ham-Digital@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Ham-Digital-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the Ham-Digital Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/ham-digital".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 4 Aug 1994 19:04:14 GMT
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!dancer.ca.sandia.gov!cronkite.nersc.gov!fastrac.llnl.gov!lll-winken.llnl.gov!fnnews.fnal.gov!usenet@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: GIANT Help Wanted
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
I just happened to run into this news group while looking
for something. I am involved in an as yet to be approved or
funded project called the GIANT array.
It seems that several of the cosmic ray experiments have seen
some very high energy events. Of order 3E20 electron volts
or the energy of a well thrown baseball. It turns out that
by theory such events are not possible unless they originate
very near to our galaxy (Well, within 50 mega parsecs - if
you call that "near") as they should be slowed down to of
order 1E18 by interaction with the 3 degree background.
Astronomers do not see a likely candidate nearby. So there
is a real mystery.
A "cosmic ray" is a single something coming in from outer
space. Those with higher energy hit atoms in the upper
atmosphere and create secondary particles. The secondaries
hit other particles, etc., and the ones we are looking for
finally result in of order 1e17 particles spread out over a
few tens of square miles. The final particles are a mix of
muons, electrons, and gamma rays. The mix is determined by
the original particle which is most likely a proton or an
iron nucleus. Which one it might be is very interesting to
physics, so the experiment is designed to sort this out by
attempting to time and identify as many particles as
possible.
To study these events an array of detectors is planned. The
present design calls for 3000 detectors each about 10' by
10'. The detector will likely be a scintillator, lead,
scintillator sandwich. We call them Leadburgers, which
distresses our leader who is a little too straight to
appreciate the humor, but he is coming around. The top
scintillator detects muons and electrons, the bottom
scintillator detects muons and gamma rays. The Leadburgers
will be spaced on a 1 mile hexagonal grid. A roughly 3000
square mile device - so we think the term GIANT is
appropriate. The whole mess will be placed out in a desert
somewhere and there will likely be two - one in each
hemisphere.
Obviously we will not be able to afford to string power lines
between all these units, so they must be solar powered. This
means very low power electronics. We will synch them all
together (GPS has been suggested though I think we can do
with less) somehow, to 50ns or better.
The plan has been to use packet switching and time division
for transmission so that there would be no two stations that
could hear each other broadcasting at the same time. (We
plan to avoid the collision problem by precisely timing all
transmissions since we need to know time accurately for the
measurement.) Thus the reason I was attracted to this news
group. As we talk about it, when one detector sees something
that might be part of a giant shower, he calls up his
neighbors on his cellular phone and asks them if they saw
something too. If they agree that an event has occurred, it
is then passed from station to station until it reaches the
control room. All this is supervised by a computer (again
low power) resident in each detector.
Because the people involved think that way, the project will
be done on a shoestring. At the moment we have no money, and
I am working for the fun of it. In the end, we hope to do
the whole project for of order 50M. So far our leader has
done pretty well rounding up the few hundred thousand needed
to bring physicists from around the world to our design study
so I am optimistic that we will get to do the project if we
do a good job of design.
The initial design study will be carried out during the
first six months of 1995 at Fermilab (near Chicago). It will
be a world wide collaboration with physics representatives
from Australia, UK, Germany, France, Russia (various former
republics), China, and our leader (a Nobel prize winner) is
even visiting Viet Nam to try to get really universal support
from the physics community. Obviously, the work is not
classified.
We are presently building and testing the instrumentation
that will go into the Leadburgers. We would soon like to do
some of the radio transmission tests that will help guide the
design here at Fermilab. We also hope to build a few station
prototype here. While those involved have experience with
most things, and indeed it is the pride of the physics
community that they can do designs of most things on the back
of an envelope from first principals; we have little
experience with radio transmission.
It is obvious from reading this group that Motorola is in our
back yard, and someplace there is the experience and talent
that we need. Also the amateur radio community could help us
a lot. I am therefore looking for someone that would want to
join in this project and give advice and perhaps even do some
work. An amateur that wanted to work with us would be very
useful during preliminary tests if his license can be used
for the experiments.
Here is an example of what I would like to test right now.
We need to know the exact time of arrival of the events.
This is used to determine the particle path and thus where it
comes from. 100 nanoseconds and 1.5 kilometer spacing gives
a path to one degree. We would like to do somewhat better.
We already know from tests in Europe, that GPS receivers can
give time to a few tens of nanoseconds. Putting a GPS
receiver on each Leadburger is a bit expensive and takes a
lot of power which is also expensive. So we would like to
perform some tests with a central tower going tick, tick,
tick, and set up a pair of receivers, phase locked loops,
etc., and see how well we can match time in a pair of
receivers spaced some distance apart.
It is not very likely that a helper will get paid any more
than I am at the moment. In particular, this is not the kind
of project where there will be a lot of pork to be grabbed up
by some political tagging of funds. That is what killed the
SSC. Hopefully we can keep this project small enough so that
the porkers do not come after us. So there is no big profit
to be expected for a commercial enterprise. We hope there is
"GLORY" however, and think that a commercial venture might
want to be identified with this project.
I personally am near retirement, and plan to make this my
entertainment for some time to come. Cosmic ray research has
rarely been the hot physics topic, so workers are here
because they like it and are having fun. After many years of
high pressure project work at Fermilab, this looks like fun
to me. I really like the people involved.
Let me know if you are interested, or know someone that is
interested. Lots of good technical paper material. Lots of
glory. Lots of fun. No money. (Not quite so bad, if we get
the project there might be travel to Australia or Chile or
wherever the southern hemisphere device goes - or even pay
for real work.)
Please do not think that you do not qualify just because you
don't have some degree or other. We have all the degrees we
need, what is needed is some good experience and smarts that
can keep us from making a dumb mistake. You will find as I
have that the physicists are quite willing to explain what
you will need at your particular level. As an engineer, I
have long noticed that physicists do not talk to each other
in complex mathematical notation as they know they will not
be understood.
Tom Droege
droege@fnald.fnal.gov
------------------------------
Date: 3 Aug 1994 20:34:39 GMT
From: newsgw.mentorg.com!wv.mentorg.com!hanko@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Is the KAM 9612 out yet ?
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
In article <1556.18.uupcb@totrbbs.atl.ga.us>, steve.diggs@totrbbs.atl.ga.us (Steve Diggs) writes:
|> -> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc
|> -> From: pfund@uni2a.unige.ch
|> -> Subject: Is the KAM 9612 out yet ?
|> -> Message-ID: <1994Aug2.170743.1@ugun2a>
|> -> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 1994 15:07:43 GMT
|> ->
|> -> Hi all,
|> ->
|> -> I just wanted to know if the KAM 9612 is out for sale yet ?
|> ->
|> -> Thanks for your info
|> ->
|> -> 73s de Daniel, HB9VBC
|>
|> They were selling like hotcakes at the Atlanta Hamfest, July 22nd. AEA
|> 9612 is a better deal, though.
|>
|> Regards,
|> Steve Diggs, KB4ZTN
|>
|> ----
|> Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA SYSOP: Steve Diggs
|> UUCP: totrbbs.atl.ga.us Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
|> Phone: +1 404 921 8687 Lilburn, GA 30247-7407
Curious why you see the AEA as a better deal?
As far as I can tell from the literature, the AEA can only
run one channel at a time (either 1200 OR 9600) while the
Kantronics can run both at once (both 1200 AND 9600).
... Hank
--
Hank Oredson @ Mentor Graphics Library Operations
Internet : hank_oredson@mentorg.com "Parts 'R Us!"
Amateur Radio: W0RLI@W0RLI.OR.USA.NOAM
------------------------------
Date: 4 Aug 94 17:07:48 GMT
From: news-mail-gateway@ucsd.edu
Subject: REJECTED: Ham-Digital Digest V94 #260
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
----- Mail rejected by CEO. -----
No Routing Link Available Mail not sent to:gary rogers@dgc.ceo
----- Unsent message follows -----
From: ham-digital@UCSD.EDU
To: Ham-Digital@UCSD.EDU
Subject: Ham-Digital Digest V94 #260
X-Ceo_Options: Document
CEO comments:
See document for message.
CEO document contents:
Ham-Digital Digest Thu, 4 Aug 94 Volume 94 : Issue 260
Today's Topics:
??USING MAC WITH KPC-3 AN
Amiga, baycom and amicom
cheap packet?
CQ Net/MAC users
Is the KAM 9612 out yet ? (2 msgs)
KaGOLD vs. KaGOLD w/pactor (2 msgs)
Looking for JVFAX 7.0
Upload FAQ MO-MIGA Magneto-Opticals
Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Ham-Digital@UCSD.Edu>
Send subscription requests to: <Ham-Digital-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
Archives of past issues of the Ham-Digital Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/ham-digital".
We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 4 Aug 1994 01:41:38 GMT
From: news.sprintlink.net!sun.cais.com!news@uunet.uu.net
Subject: ??USING MAC WITH KPC-3 AN
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
Go ahead and use the Mac with the Hostmaster,it works wonderfully.I've
been using that setup for the last 1 1/2 years and have no complaint.
A standard modem cable will work fine with the TNC and the Mac.I get
better results by setting my abaud to 9600...
Will be glad to be of more assistance.Matter fact,I run a BBS that has
a good collection of Ham related sharewae,might want to give it a call
and see if you could use something.
The phone number is 202-298-6009.
Take care...
------------------------------
Date: 3 Aug 1994 20:12:58 -0500
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!not-for-mail@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: Amiga, baycom and amicom
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
Greetings! Has anyone out in netland used the baycomm modem with an amiga? If so did you use it with amicom software or
amiganos? Did you need to make any mods to the baycom? Any info is appreciated.
dave
n9uxu
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 1994 08:51:44 -0400
From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!ncar!noao!asuvax!pitstop.mcd.mot.com!mcdphx!schbbs!mothost!lmpsbbs!NewsWatcher!user@network.ucsd.edu
Subject: cheap packet?
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
In article <CtpwIE.5ow@eskimo.com>, rdonnell@eskimo.com (Bob Donnell)
wrote:
> Ross Frederick Blakeney (aa568@cfn.cs.dal.ca) wrote:
>
>
> : --
> : hello all, just wondering if there is anyway to use my modem as a TNC
> : if I have a program for the baymod or similar????
> : TIA
> : 73 de VE1RFB
> : -Ross-
>
>
> Sorry, have to say, no, it's not going to work. The modulation standards
> used for phone modems and packet radio are different. The closest you could
> come (and it >has< been used before) is to find an obsolete Bell 202 modem
> and modify it for radio interface, TX/RX control, etc.
>
> 73, Bob KD7NM
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bob Donnell, kd7nm bob@ethanac.kd7nm.ampr.org rdonnell@eskimo.com
> Western Washington Amateur IP Address Coordinator (206) 775-3651
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you mean by the word "obsolete" in relatikon to a 202 modem? It's
still the most popular modem when sending data over any type of radio link.
The reason being that the 202 is the ONLY modem which does NOT require a
full-duplex (ala phoneline) audio path to hear the modem at the far end
before it considers itself connected. The reason why 1200/2200 FSK still
remains popular with the amateur packet community is that it works and is
presently the ONLY commercial modem standard that does work!
--
Karl Beckman, P.E. < If this English language is so
>
Motorola LMPS.RNSG.Analog Data < precise, why do you drive on a
>
(Square waves & round corners) < parkway and park on a driveway?
>
Any opinions expressed here do not belong to or represent Motorola Inc.
Amateur radio WA8NVW NavyMARS NNN0VBH @
NOGBN.NOASI
------------------------------
Date: 3 Aug 1994 21:27:04 -0400
From: newstf01.cr1.aol.com!search01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail@uunet.uu.net
Subject: CQ Net/MAC users
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
I have downloaded a copy of net mac and am now configuring it for my
Mac...
I would like to learn the paths to get connected here in northern
california. The most reliable mountaintop for me is Sonoma Mt on 145.73. I
live in West Marin county.
Anty help (advice), especially about obtaining an IP address would be
appreciated.
Thanks in Advance KD6ZZM
------------------------------
Date: 3 Aug 1994 09:35:08 GMT
From:
sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!convex!news.duke.edu!eff!news.kei.com!uhog.mit.edu!news.mtholyoke.edu!news.unomaha.edu!crcnis1.un
l.edu!@@lll-winken.llnl.gov
Subject: Is the KAM 9612 out yet ?
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
steve.diggs@totrbbs.atl.ga.us (Steve Diggs) writes:
>They were selling like hotcakes at the Atlanta Hamfest, July 22nd. AEA
>9612 is a better deal, though.
Okay, I'll bite. What's a 9612?
Gary
------------------------------
Date: 3 Aug 94 00:13:00 GMT
From: agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!emory!wa4mei!totrbbs!steve.diggs@ames.arpa
Subject: Is the KAM 9612 out yet ?
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
-> Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.digital.misc
-> From: pfund@uni2a.unige.ch
-> Subject: Is the KAM 9612 out yet ?
-> Message-ID: <1994Aug2.170743.1@ugun2a>
-> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 1994 15:07:43 GMT
->
-> Hi all,
->
-> I just wanted to know if the KAM 9612 is out for sale yet ?
->
-> Thanks for your info
->
-> 73s de Daniel, HB9VBC
They were selling like hotcakes at the Atlanta Hamfest, July 22nd. AEA
9612 is a better deal, though.
Regards,
Steve Diggs, KB4ZTN
----
Top Of The Rock BBS - Lilburn, GA SYSOP: Steve Diggs
UUCP: totrbbs.atl.ga.us Snailmail: 4181 Wash Lee Ct.
Phone: +1 404 921 8687 Lilburn, GA 30247-7407
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 94 12:55:22 MST
From: elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ennews!stat!david@ames.arpa
Subject: KaGOLD vs. KaGOLD w/pactor
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
kenman@iastate.edu (Kenneth D Anderson) writes:
>
> I'm thinking of buying one of the GOLD programs to use with my KPC-3. I'm a
> little confused: Obviously KaGOLD will work fine, but will KaGOLD w/pactor
> work on my KPC-3? (At a later date, I might want to "upgrade" to a KAM and
> use the pactor functions).
>
> The limited information I have doesn't make it clear.
The pactor option will only work on a KAM, it will not allow pactor to
run on a non-pactor tnc.
david
---
Editor, HICNet Medical Newsletter
Internet: david@stat.com FAX: +1 (602) 451-1165
Bitnet : ATW1H@ASUACAD
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 1994 14:51:19 GMT
From:
ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!news.hal.COM!olivea!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!psgrain!rainrgnews0!pacifier!news.alpha.net!mvb.saic.com!eskimo!aandh@
network.ucsd.edu
Subject: KaGOLD vs. KaGOLD w/pactor
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
Hi befor you spend $100 for gold take
a look at xpkam you can download it from KF7XP
bbs at 602 8981058 I think you will find it as good as gold
for a lot less $$$$$$$ 73 Jim K7UDG/UA4PDG
for a lot less $$$$$$$$
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 1994 11:38:53 +0200
From: zib-berlin.de!news.th-darmstadt.de!fauern!rrze.uni-erlangen.de!not-for-mail@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Looking for JVFAX 7.0
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
ron@alpha.nsula.edu (Ron Wright) writes:
>I posted this question a couple of weeks ago and the only responses were
>"I'm looking too, let me know if you find it!".
>so here goes: Has anyone found the new version of JVFAX....
>The new version is JVFAX 7.0 which I understand was recently released.
>Ron - KA5LUG
>--
Hello dear Ron,
I talked to Eberhard, DK8JV a few days ago.
JVFAX Version 7 will be released within the next two months.
At the present time only "Beta-Releases" of Version 7 were given
to a limited group of persons.
So please "qrx" and keep waiting
73 de Dieter, DF4RD
Email: unrz45@daphne.rrze.uni-erlangen.de
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ===== ===== ===== | Ron Wright | Voice: (318) 357-5594
> | | | | | | | User Support Specialist |
> |N| |S| |U| | Northwestern State University | Fax: (318) 357-5745
> | | | | | | | Computer Center |
> ===== ===== ===== | Natchitoches, Louisiana | Ron@alpha.nsula.edu
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 1994 12:39:03 +0000
From: pipex!demon!flevel.demon.co.uk!david@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Upload FAQ MO-MIGA Magneto-Opticals
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
The following has been uploaded to Aminet (ftp.luth.se).
Please allow usual time to mirror to other sites
References also to running under NETbsd and MSDOS with
BFFSand PCfiling systems and for installation
on PC systems. MO-MIGAs are V. fast magneto opticals
for multimedia/video/animations/digitizing/netserving/cdrom
mastering applications. Preliminary info about 22G Juke boxes
included.
FileName: MO-MIGA.FAQ.lha ........<note abbreviated filename
for aminet
Short: Magneto Optical Information - MO-MIGA
Uploader: david@flevel.demon.co.uk (David Southwell)
Author: david@flevel.demon.co.uk (David Southwell)
Type: docs/misc
FAQs about the new MO-MIGA 1.2GB Magneto Optical drive.
Contact addresses and speed tests included.
Also now in ftp.demon.co.uk:/pub/amiga/info/MO-MIGA.2.41.FAQ.lha
^^^^^
note full file name
If anyone wants a copy in either ascii or .lha/.gz/.Z
with .uue encoding please email support@flevel.demon.co.uk
with two line in the body of the message:
FAQ_PLEASE
Followed by
MAIL <ver> where ver is either ascii or .gz.uue or .lha.uue or .Z.uue
We apologise if you have received this article twice within twenty four
hours. Unfortunately our newserver "lost" a load of postings
(we think the whole lot) so we have had to repost. The bug has now been
fixed and we hope no-one but ourselves has been inconvenienced.
<;-( .............. <goat droppings
--
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
! Email david@flevel.demon.co.uk !
! Fourth Level Developments Optical Magneto Drive Systems !
! Multi-Media System Developers for Amiga, PC & Apple !
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 1994 16:38:00 GMT
From: world!dts@uunet.uu.net
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
References <1994Jul28.163628.9346@hayes>, <31i6qf$9qt@nanette.pdb.sni.de>, <31jnlu$i7s@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>swidi
Subject : Re: GTOR--A big improvement?
In article <31jnlu$i7s@darkstar.UCSC.EDU>,
James H. Haynes <haynes@cats.ucsc.edu> wrote:
>
>In article <31i6qf$9qt@nanette.pdb.sni.de>,
>W.F.Schroeder <schroeder.pad@sni.de> wrote:
>>In <1994Jul28.163628.9346@hayes> bcoleman@hayes.com (Bill Coleman) writes:
>>
>>[lines deleted]
>>
>>>> Another tack is a multi-tone system like Piccolo.
>>
>>>Mutiple tones is the way to go for HF. You have to keep the symbol rate low
>
>>Do you have any detailed suggestions? How many tones? baud? protocol?
>>Make it work with the common 500Hz IF filters.
>
As I understand the Telebit PEP protocol (used in Telebit landline modems),
it divides the telephone bandwidth (3kHz) into 512 or so frequencies, then
sends bits down each frequency. I believe they do use phase modulation on
each frequency, since they are set up to send 0,2,4,6, or 8 bits per baud,
per frequency. Given the earlier comments about HF propagation, something
similar but without the phase stuff (i.e. 1 bit per baud) might be interesting,
then restrict the width to the number of distinct frequencies that can
fit in 500Hz.
Telebit uses a TI 320xx chip (I forget which one is in the latest modem) to
generate the waveform. It sounds downright ugly if you accidentally pick
up a phone and listen...
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Senie Internet: dts@world.std.com
Daniel Senie Consulting n1jeb@world.std.com
508-779-0439 Compuserve: 74176,1347
------------------------------
End of Ham-Digital Digest V94 #260
******************************
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 94 12:15:07 -0500
From: news.delphi.com!usenet@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Tandy 1000EX
To: ham-digital@ucsd.edu
Mike Grose <mike.grose@bthouse.com> writes:
>I have a friend trying to get his packet station going. He has a Tandy
>1000EX with the memory expansion board giving it 640 ram. It loads up
>DOS fine, but when he loads up a packet program, it gives an error
>message:Pack File Corrupt. Does anyone have any suggestions on
>correcting this problem. He has an AEA PK232-MBX tnc also. Any help
>would be appreciated. 73's de KE4CLE.
Without having any info on which program he is using, it sounds
like a bad executeable. I would suggest that he try a [plain-jane
comm package like PAX (my favorite for just putting around), or
anything else he would use to run a modem. If he can controll
it with a commpackage, get a new copy of the packet software.
Another good idea would be to check the laptop for viruses!
practice safe computing!
73 de n1qdq
------------------------------
End of Ham-Digital Digest V94 #261
******************************